<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do I know You? Are your Social Media Connections Real?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jesseliebman.com/2009/02/01/do-i-know-you-are-your-social-media-connections-real/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jesseliebman.com/2009/02/01/do-i-know-you-are-your-social-media-connections-real/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:38:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.jesseliebman.com/2009/02/01/do-i-know-you-are-your-social-media-connections-real/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jesseliebman.com/?p=255#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Most social media users aren&#039;t your typical web surfer...for instance, I still think that twitter is right on the precipice of going mainstream but the majority of its users are still the &quot;web savvy&quot; group.

I know what you are saying about a web traffic increase.  But the real question is what did your metrics say about the traffic you were getting?  Did the people stay on the page?  Was the bounce rate and time spent on site high or low?  Did it affect your overall bottom line?

I bet that it was pretty much the &quot;digg&quot; like junk traffic that eats up bandwidth but doesn&#039;t have a high ROI...traffic for traffic&#039;s sake.  If not, I would be surprised.

I will have to take a look at the law of impressions...sound like an interesting theory.  Interesting post, Jesse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most social media users aren&#8217;t your typical web surfer&#8230;for instance, I still think that twitter is right on the precipice of going mainstream but the majority of its users are still the &#8220;web savvy&#8221; group.</p>
<p>I know what you are saying about a web traffic increase.  But the real question is what did your metrics say about the traffic you were getting?  Did the people stay on the page?  Was the bounce rate and time spent on site high or low?  Did it affect your overall bottom line?</p>
<p>I bet that it was pretty much the &#8220;digg&#8221; like junk traffic that eats up bandwidth but doesn&#8217;t have a high ROI&#8230;traffic for traffic&#8217;s sake.  If not, I would be surprised.</p>
<p>I will have to take a look at the law of impressions&#8230;sound like an interesting theory.  Interesting post, Jesse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
